Sunday, June 28, 2009

A direct report from Congress. :-)


Saturday, Harry Teague, Democrat Congressman from New Mexico's 3rd District (where I live) returned home after having voted in favor of the "Cap & Trade" energy bill. His local office announced a "Harry In Your Hometown" meeting with the Congressman, to be held at 2:00 p.m., in a small, rather low class place called Old Town Restaurant. Joanna and I attended.

When we arrived, the restaurant was crowded, largely with people dining. We later ascertained that most of these early arrivals were Teague supporters. More people continued to arrive and the Congressman made his appearance exactly at the scheduled time. A man walked into the restaurant holding overhead a sign which read "Cap & Trade = Big Tax". The sign was greeted by loud applause and cheering.

The place was very noisy. To my left was the kitchen with typical busy kitchen sounds of pots and pans, dishes clattering, blenders running, etc. To my right, it seemed everyone in the crowd was talking at once. Mr. Teague seated himself at the end of a long table and engaged in quiet conversation with an attendee.

A woman, presumably from Teague's local staff, made some announcements which were completely inaudible to me. In my usual vulgar fashion I yelled "We can't hear you." Someone explained that Teague would be visiting one-on-one with people who had submitted their name as wanting to discuss something or other with the Congressman.

A man standing near me shouted in a loud voice, "No, no, Harry. That's not good enough. Stand up and talk to us." Mr Teague responded by standing and speaking. With no microphone or amplification in a noisy environment, it was impossible to hear everything he was saying. He said something about global warming, and several people shouted "What global warming?"

I then understood the Congressman to say he had been advised by House leadership that they had enough votes to pass the "Cap & Trade" bill before he voted. He went on to say that "I could have voted against the bill and come home and told you that I had voted against the bill on principal....." At this point, he was drowned out by people yelling things like "What principal?" or "You have no principals". Then the crowd began to chant "One term Harry". I joined in.

The word drifted back that someone had asked him if he had read the bill and he replied that he had. Later someone else reported that his comment was that he had not personally read the bill but "staff" had read it.

A woman took the "Cap & Trade = Big Tax" sign and stood behind the Congressman, holding the sign over his head. A female voice behind me asked "Who's that jerk with the sign?" A man's voice answered, "Someone opposed to more taxes" She said, "That's better than a black earth." A black earth? Did she mean an earth with no more electric lights? I whirled around and looked her straight in the face for a long look. She was wearing a printed shirt with something about NMSU and a lot of other printing, which I did not read. I didn't recognize her, but she struck me as the iconic green. No, she was not talking about the end of electric power as we know it. I reminded myself that I hadn't come here to argue with the likes of this person.

A man seated at a nearby table made a snide remark about the Congressman. A member of the local Teague staff (they were all dressed in dark sports coats, like Secret Service Wannabes) made some challenge to that remark. The man said "F--- You." Immediately, the woman who had tried to make earlier anouncements, approached the staffer from behind and said, "You shut up. Right now."

The Congressman sat back down on his chair and resumed his conversation with the first person in a line of six or eight waiting for a personal conversation with him. At this point, he completely ignored the rest of the crowd. I turned to the man next to me and said I had heard all I expected to hear. He replied, "The man is an idiot." We left. But it had been fun mixing with a crowd as angry as you are!

Sunday morning's local newspaper made no mention of the event, but local email is buzzing. One writer declared, "I think that Harry Teague might feel a little less love than he thought he would get today." Then, they added, "He said that his vote didn't matter because the bill had already passed. SO does that mean that it's okay to sell out your constituency because everyone else has?"

Well, I haven't read the "Cap & Trade" bill either, but I did listen to John Boehner read parts of the 300 page amendment. What a bunch of gibberish that was! It is my personal observation that the Obama Administration is seeking to make Congress irrelevant, and that Congress seems too dumb to realize it!

14 comments:

  1. I'm fine with a little political dissonance and arguing the facts, but from what you've said about this event you and many others there should be ashamed for acting like children. Argue with the man, sure, but show some damn respect.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Respect? When do they ever show US any respect? We elect them, we pay their salaries, and they refuse to listen to us, instead busting their butts to pass new taxes to send us to the poor house, while bankrupting our country and sending it down the road to socialism. Sam is one of the most respectful people you would ever want to meet....to those who deserve it.

    My comment on your post is: HURRAH!!! IT'S ABOUT TIME! I plan to greet Dennis Moore in exactly the same manner, and couldn't be more thrilled with your report! Thanks so much for sharing!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Respect? Let's see. These people just voted on 1,500 pages of gibberish they had not read. They voted for it to become a code which we all would have to obey, a fully enforceable law, without even knowing what that code would require of us. What is there to respect? Show me some damn common sense.

    ReplyDelete
  4. You are nothing more than an arrogant muckracking scofflaw.

    ReplyDelete
  5. You prefer Pearce, who came around with his "Social Security listening tour" which was NOT listening but him and his henchmen telling us a lot of lies about how rich we would all be if we were forced to invest in the stock market?

    I have both Social Security and stock market investments. My investments lost half their value this year, dividends cut in half. My Social Security payment increased.

    ReplyDelete
  6. If, as some claim they didn't read the bill, then how much creditability do they have in criticizing the contents of it, it can't be both ways. If one is relying on radio talks show hosts, TV talking heads and Congress members that are openly working to obstruct ANY legislation that might be something positive for WE The People for analysis, its no wonder so much misinformation and out right lies is passing as fact. This nonsense about bankrupting the country coming from the same people that didn't bat an eye or question any of the spending of the previous Admin, including the tons of money dumped into that bottomless pit known as Iraq is laughable.

    July 2, 2009 8:43 AM

    ReplyDelete
  7. Wow- I can't believe I'm even commenting on a blog filled with so much hatred, ignorance and misinformation. While denying the reality of global warming, you should educate us all with your arguments about a flat earth and the moon landing hoax.

    Your hatred and anger at being the minority opinion is clouding your better judgement- and causing you to be disruptive, counterproductive and marginalized at public meetings. You will get nowhere exhibiting such behavior.

    But keep talking amongst yourselves, let your hatred stew and boil inside you, and the rest of America will continue to address the debacle left over from the Bush years with reasoned, democratic and sensible solutions. You can burn as hot as you want for a long as you want- wasting your few precious years remaining on this planet as god-fearing, change-hating, money-loving patriots. Have fun with that.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Respect must be earned, it is not elected or given. It is best to be civil and polite however. Congressman Teague has not earned much respect from the majority of his constituents with his numerous votes in favor of liberal issues, like locking up public lands from our multiple use, bills enriching trial lawyers, and now this travesty of a climate tax bill. As a scientist with several decades of experience in the earth's climate system and history, I can assure you that CO2 (human or otherwise) is but a minor factor in the earth's constantly changing climate. This Waxman-Markey bill is about taxes, wealth redistribution, and pork, not the environment.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Its interesting to read, all the whining about Congressman Teague not EARNING the respect of his constitute. I think that translates to he isn't bowing to the wants of the fringe right so they are unhappy about it. To start with this bill is NOT legislation exclusive to his constituents, its NOT a liberal or conservative issue, its about issues that affect everyone. A basic fact that needs to be understood, the President is a Democrat, the House and Senate are a Democratic majority put there by a majority of voters in 06 and 08, they are going to advance Democratic policies and ideals, elections have consequences, DEAL WITH IT.

    ReplyDelete
  10. True anon, elections have consequences, and so do subsequent elections, building on the consequences of the previous mistakes. Harry will soon enough understand the consequences of his votes for Pelosi and Obama's agendas of left wing causes with no substance except advancing liberal idealogy.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Regardless if one agrees with how Representative Teague votes on legislation or not President Obama and Speaker Pelosi were handed a mandate by voters to Govern. The Republican Party and their Ideology were REJECTED by the American People in 06 and 08, if New Mexico's Third District wants to make themselves MORE irrelevant by replacing Rep Teague with another Republican, so be it. BTW, people who throw around the label of "Liberal" as if that were something negative I offer this quote: "If by a "Liberal" they mean someone who looks ahead and not behind, someone who welcomes new ideas without rigid reactions, someone who cares about the welfare of the people -- their health, their housing, their schools, their jobs, their civil rights, and their civil liberties -- someone who believes we can break through the stalemate and suspicions that grip us in our policies abroad, if that is what they mean by a "Liberal," then I'm proud to say I'm a "Liberal." John F. Kennedy[September 14, 1960]

    ReplyDelete
  12. Jack Kennedy is not remembered as a "great" president, but he certainly was a great man. He was a brave warrior for freedom in the South Pacific where, yes, he killed people.

    While in Congress, he wrote a book which he titled "Profiles In Courage", illustrating his deep admiration for courageous people.

    As president, he believed people should have access to their president, and (sadly, as it turned out) demonstrated that belief by riding in an open convertible through the streets of America's cities...just as he had exposed himself to the Japanese Navy during the war, because he believed the job required it.

    Kennedy was not adept at hiding - his person or his idenity.

    Yes, he had lofty goals for humankind. And, he certainly was not afraid or ashamed to put his name on the quote about being a liberal.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Outsiders here need to get some things correct. Harry is not from the 3rd District (that is Ben Ray), he is in the 2nd District. There is nothing wrong with being a liberal, just as there is nothing wrong with being a conservative. I don't believe many liberal type policies (most economic, environmental, legal) are to my liking and I would not support them. But then again many conservative policies (like social, religious, etc.) are also not to my liking and I would not support them. America is a very diverse and complex group of people and policy ideas. No party has a lock on the majority for very long. Obama and the Dems won a mandate, but if they go to far left (as they currently are), they will lose that mandate and majority come 2010.

    ReplyDelete
  14. You covered the event very well. I was also there with my young daughter. No, I didn't vote for Teague, but I wanted to hear why he voted for the bill. You know, when you walk in and think you are going to talk to people quietly in a corner so no one else can hear your responses, you need to realize that isn't going to work. A towhnall meeting is an open meeting, not a little one on one in the corner. We sat next to people who told us to leave because we weren't there to support him. I'm sorry, I have the right to hold my representative accountable, even if I didn't vote for him. I wrote about the same thing on my blog and if you get a chance, check your stats, I'm sure you're getting visits from the House of Reps. I know I am. Maybe that is a good thing - maybe Harry will wake up and realize he's "an oil main, raised one and will always be one". That's fine Harry, but you don't help out your buddies on the east side and send the rest of us down the river. Besides, most of NM doesn't get their gas from the east side of the state, so "saving .20 to .40 a gallon" doesn't mean much to us. You are responsible to all of us, not just your chosen oil friends.

    As for reading the bill, I know you didn't read it because you told my husband that you didn't. Shame on you for what you are doing in Washington.

    ReplyDelete